This material has been developed for use on desktop computers.

OCT knowledge checker:

Identifying disease biomarkers:
How relevant is OCT-A?

Images provided by Richard Gale, York and Scarborough
Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust

Disclosures

Fees for:

Apellis, AbbVie, Alimera, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Heidelberg, Novartis, Notal vision, Roche, Santen

Disclaimers

 

The case studies presented are from real patients and are used with permission.

Introduction to OCT-A (optical coherence tomography angiography)

  • OCT-A is a non-invasive imaging technique that utilises motion-contrast imaging and calculates differences in signal intensity between consecutive scans of the same ocular region to produce high-quality, cross-sectional scans of vascular flow
  • OCT-A can be used for the identification of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) in a range of ocular pathologies
  • Although a useful diagnostic tool, OCT-A may be prone to imaging artefacts; therefore, an understanding of associated artefacts is essential to reduce the risk of misinterpretation and ensure accurate assessment of retinopathies
  • OCT-A imaging artefacts may include the following:
    • Distortion artefacts, caused by errors in image processing and display, or ocular motion
    • Shadow artefacts, caused by superficial retinal vessels and vitreous opacities (e.g. ocular floaters)
    • Projection artefacts, caused by interference from superficial vessels during imaging of deep tissue structures

Identifying OCT-A artefacts

Click on the top right image to identify the projection artefacts

Identifying OCT-A artefacts

 

  • It is important to identify movement in CNV or macular neovascularisation (MNV) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)1
  • Pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and large drusen are often prominent in nAMD, and may be misinterpreted as new blood vessels on OCT-A1–3
  • In this instance, the en face image appears as if it is showing vascular flow; however, this is an example of a projection artefact1

Identifying neovascularisation in nAMD (structural OCT)

 

  • The PED and hyperreflective material (HRM) seen in the structural OCT image are highly suggestive of CNV1

Is OCT-A needed to support this diagnosis?

  • The ATHENA study is a non-inferiority, prospective, randomised trial designed to understand the diagnostic accuracy of structural OCT with OCT-A, versus OCT with fundus fluorescein angiography (FA), for the identification of nAMD2
  • Results from the ATHENA trial will help understand whether OCT-A is necessary to support structural OCT in the diagnosis of nAMD2

Identifying neovascularisation in nAMD (OCT-A)

Click on the image to identify the OCT-A marker that denotes neovascularisation

Identifying neovascularisation in nAMD (OCT-A)

 

  • The white marker identified by the OCT-A represents vascular flow, which confirms the diagnosis of neovascularisation, as suggested by the structural OCT1
    • The ATHENA study will assess the importance of using OCT-A versus FA to confirm diagnosis made on OCT2
  • The white marker in this image is an example of a well-defined ‘medusa’ pattern; however, there are a variety of patterns identifiable through OCT-A that denote neovascular lesions, such as ‘seafan’ and ‘dead tree’ patterns3

Morphologic characteristics of neovascularisation using OCT-A

Click on the OCT-A image to identify the ‘dead tree’ pattern

Morphologic characteristics of neovascularisation using OCT-A

 

  • The pattern shown here is often referred to as a ‘dead tree’ pattern and is associated with chronic and inactive CNV or MNV1
  • The subretinal fluid (SRF) identified by the structural OCT supports this diagnosis of disease activity2

Implications of OCT-A patterns in nAMD

  • Although there are a variety of OCT-A patterns that can aid diagnosis of nAMD through the identification of neovascular lesions, these patterns are not always suitable as a guide for treatment criteria1,2
  • OCT biomarkers of nAMD, such as intraretinal fluid (IRF) and SRF, should be used to inform treatment decisions where possible3
    • A dye-based imaging technique such as FA may be considered in cases where OCT-A does not support presence of neovascularisation2,4

Nonexudative CNV

Click on the OCT-A image to identify the marker that denotes neovascularisation

Nonexudative CNV

 

  • In this example, the structural OCT (bottom right) does not show any typical exudative features (e.g. IRF or SRF); however, the OCT-A pattern (top right) indicates presence of CNV1
    • This is an example of nonexudative CNV
  • Approximately 10% of eyes with nonexudative neovascularisation may become exudative within 1 year and may consequently require frequent monitoring of exudation2

Key takeaways

  • It is important to understand the intricacies of OCT-A and associated artefacts prior to its implementation1
    • These may include distortion, shadow, or projection artefacts
  • The necessity of performing an OCT-A versus FA to confirm a diagnosis based on OCT disease biomarkers is being explored in the ATHENA study2
  • There are a range of OCT-A patterns that represent neovascularisation in nAMD, which may help with the diagnosis of nAMD, but are not always suitable as a guide for treatment criteria3,4
  • Eyes with nonexudative neovascularisation identified by OCT-A should be monitored due to a risk of becoming exudative5

Thank you for completing this OCT knowledge checker